Bug#632384: qutecom crashing

2012-08-15 Thread lkcl luke
it's actually more serious than this - and also easier to reproduce. simply go to "enable video", select the webcam and qutecom instantly crashes. no connection, no registration, no internet is required. (warn) 15:26:23 [Common] virtual WebcamErrorCode V4L2WebcamDriver::setPalette(pixosi): Failed

Bug#660178: [Debian-olpc-devel] Bug#660178: don't use xulrunner 10.0.2!

2012-02-19 Thread lkcl luke
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660487 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660482 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#660178: [Debian-olpc-devel] Bug#660178: don't use xulrunner 10.0.2!

2012-02-19 Thread lkcl luke
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Then file it against xulrunner-dev.  My point is that you should file a > bugreport against the package containing the bug, not the package(s) or > other bugs affected by it. got it. 1st one's #660482 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi

Bug#660178: [Debian-olpc-devel] Bug#660178: don't use xulrunner 10.0.2!

2012-02-19 Thread lkcl luke
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> also the other bug (the original one) was related to jemalloc >> (whatever that is), and disabling that sorts out the problem [only to >> run smack into this focus manager one instead]. > > Best if you could file a separate bugreport ab

Bug#660178: don't use xulrunner 10.0.2!

2012-02-18 Thread lkcl luke
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/742d5f9f284d this shows that someone (olli) knows that there's something up with the focus manager stuff. there's quite a few changes been made to the focus stuff: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/log/4d47329bb02e/dom/base/nsFocusManager.cpp also th

Bug#660178: don't use xulrunner 10.0.2!

2012-02-18 Thread lkcl luke
rright. there's a _second_ segfault related to mouse-move events which i've had to raise a 2nd bugreport for: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728645 on the whole i'd be inclined to conclude that xulrunner 10.0.2 definitely isn't ready for public release into debian/testing. #0 0x0

Bug#657075: python-hulahop

2012-02-17 Thread lkcl luke
dear experimenter, please can you try the following: ii xulrunner-9.09.0.1-1 XUL + XPCOM application runner ii xulrunner-dev9.0.1-1 Development files for the Gecko engine library ii python-xpcom 1:

Bug#652745: ubuntu packaging already done for razor-qt

2011-12-20 Thread lkcl luke
ubuntu launchpad packaging is already done so it should be a trivial matter to get this into debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org