I wonder whether his bug should be closed. The behaviour described in the
report no longer exists in version 67.0.1. (There is a warning about live
bookmarks, though, but that's - I'd say - a different problem.)
--Martin
I tried with a new user and got the same result.
Reverse Depends:
Depends: libgl1-mesa-dri
Depends: libxatracker2
Home of the bug! They were both completely outdated. After the update I could
safely remove the old llvm library, and now qtcreator works.
Thx 2 u both, and sorry for bothering
Hi Lisandro,
thank you for your reply.
I will answer your questions in two parts, because I haven't got much time
right now - I'm to help with the European elections. What I can give you here
is the output from:
~$ qtcreator -profile
Profiling started
>loadLibrary Core
For some reason unknown to me there are several packages still depending on
this special version of libLLVM. When I try to remove it, qtcreator is listed
among them. As is xorg - which prevents me from performing the `apt-get remove`.
On Sat, 25 May 2019 12:59:16 +0300 Alexander Kernozhitsky
Looks good after the upgrade. Thanks a lot for the quick help!
The bug should be downgraded to one concerning Debian package dependencies.
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 11:56:29 +0100
Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
> Hello Martin Haase,
>
> > ii libtorrent-rasterbar9 1.1.9-1
>
> You probably have also to
This, put in .fluxbox/menu, opens the NEdit text editor, which then complains:
Can't open /home/.../file:/usr/share/applications/oolite.desktop: No such file
or directory
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:39:35 +0100
Nicolas Boulenguez wrote:
> I cannot reproduce with the awesome window manager. In case
On Sat, 05 May 2012 21:53:28 +0200
Frank Küster wrote:
> Then, maybe, it is a *different* package that removed
> /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf? Do you have dpkg logfiles, and could you check
> whether there were any tex-related removals?
this seems to be all i can find. all of which is related to the p
On Sat, 5 May 2012 23:42:38 +0900
Norbert Preining wrote:
>
> > Setting up tex-common (3.10) ...
> > rm: cannot remove /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf': No such file or directory
>
> Did you *upgrade* or make a new installation?
a new installation on a brandnew hdd (well, some weeks ago, and i've run a f
On Sat, 5 May 2012 16:19:18 +0200
Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> This should have been fixed in latest jadetex. Which version are you
> using?
3.13-13
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
But it is not I who runs it manually, it's the system startup! I see
five udev start messages until I finally (after about 2 minutes) am
able to log in!
I'm not that dull! :(
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:18:09 +
ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
> This is an automatic notif
sry for spamming, but this may be the last message for a while. because
the funny thing is that when i start (the freshly created) xfstt either
directly or via the /etc/init.d script it segfaults. however, wenn i
start it with gdb and detach the debugger, the bug does not appear at
all. i am probab
addition: the freshly built binary segfaults as well. I'll try and get
a backtrace...
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:35:19 +0100
Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 10:20:55 +0100, Martin H. Thomas wrote:
> > Package: xfstt
> > Version: 1.7-6
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > This is what I
hmm... hard to tell as from my side. i did as you advised me, with the
source code "apt-get source" fetches. however, the bug does not appear
in this build - but it is still reproducable by a call to the original
binary at /usr/bin. hence the problem seems to be connected to the deb
package. i shal
moron!
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:43:58 +0200
Patrik Fimml wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20:35PM +0200, subhuman wrote:
> > > That's a command to be typed at the gdb prompt, and the output of it is
> > > what I am after.
> >
> > You should have told me
to some stable program instead.
Sorry you missed, pal.
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:43:58 +0200
Patrik Fimml wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:20:35PM +0200, subhuman wrote:
> > > That's a command to be typed at the gdb prompt, and the output of it is
> > > what I am aft
> That's a command to be typed at the gdb prompt, and the output of it is
> what I am after.
You should have told me that
>
> Besides, you ran gdb as "gdb abiword": This will probably run the 2.6.8
> executable, and not the one we just compiled with debugging symbols. You
> should give the full
> > gdb abiword
> [...]
> > (gdb) q
> > The program is running. Exit anyway? (y or n) y
>
> You forgot the most important thing: "thread apply all bt full"
Wot? You're talking in riddles...
>
> > Find gdb.txt attached
>
> Also, you don't need to attach both gdb.txt and the terminal output,
>
> Please configure it with
> CFLAGS="-g" CXXFLAGS="-g" ./configure --prefix=/tmp/abiword-2.7.4-inst
> --disable-gnomeui --disable-gnomevfs
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-gnomeui, --disable-gnomevfs
Configuration:
host i686-pc-linux-gnu
dynamic binary
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:54:02 +0200
Patrik Fimml wrote:
Thank you very much for your quick reply. The last time I reported the bug in
question (about 5 weeks ago) I didn't get any response at all.
> You are very welcome to fix it yourself. If that's not an option, then
> please drop the reproach
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.86.ds1-59
Linux: Linux version 2.6.22-1-686 (Debian 2.6.22-3) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc
version 4.1.3 20070718 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-14)) #1 SMP Sun Jul 29
14:37:42 UTC 2007
The script /etc/init.d/umountroot fails to unmount the root directory
and remount it i
Package: audacious
Version: 1.5.1
Linux: Linux version 2.6.22-1-686 (Debian 2.6.22-3) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc
version 4.1.3 20070718 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-14)) #1 SMP Sun Jul 29
14:37:42 UTC 2007
Both audacious, and xine fail to start after a shared objects file
couldn't be found. The name
root 565 2005-10-31 13:40 50cyrtexinfo.cnf
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:51:33 +0200
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> subhuman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> We are the maintainer for all texlive packages, so that should concern
> us. Can you please post the re
hi norbert,
first of all thx for your quick reply.
i followed your recommendation and reinstalled texlive-base - after
which the first bug had disappeared. the second bug:
> `omega -ini -jobname=omega -progname=omega omega.ini' failed
resulted from the package texlive-omega not being installed.
Package: texlive-base-bin
Version: 2007.dfsg.2-1
Linux version 2.6.22-1-686 (Debian 2.6.22-3) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.1.3 20070718 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-14))
Output has been stored in
/tmp/fmtutil.FgxB6299
Please include this file if you report a bug.
Here it is:
fmtutil: runni
24 matches
Mail list logo
