On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 1:01 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> Hi Ross,
>
> On 15-06-2022 23:46, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > On rereading, I notice an additional ambiguity. I believe I read
> > "postgres account with which this package should perform
> > administrative actions." as meaning the sql account *na
Hi Ross,
On 15-06-2022 23:46, Ross Boylan wrote:
On rereading, I notice an additional ambiguity. I believe I read
"postgres account with which this package should perform
administrative actions." as meaning the sql account *named* postgres
(or, more generally, the overall sql admin account, whi
Thanks for your response. It's not clear to me what more information
you want; you seem to be following what I did pretty well.
On rereading, I notice an additional ambiguity. I believe I read
"postgres account with which this package should perform
administrative actions." as meaning the sql ac
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Dear Ross,
Your bug report below was just reassigned to dbconfig-pgsql which I
maintain.
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 19:11:11 -0800 Ross Boylan
wrote:
Package: bacula-director-pgsql
Version: 9.4.2-2+deb10u1
Severity: normal
* What led up to the situation?
My 2nd a
Package: bacula-director-pgsql
Version: 9.4.2-2+deb10u1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
My 2nd attempt to install bacula after initial failure of
Bug#1000174.
Because of that, configuration asks lower-priority questions.
I requested password based
5 matches
Mail list logo
