On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 10:10:04 +0100
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> I think, if there are no objections from other, that we can look
> forward into merging the grab-cve-fixes and merge-cve-list updates.
Hi Neil,
I think, if there are no objections from other, that we can look
forward into merging the grab-cve-fixes and merge-cve-list updates.
While testing there was one minor glitch which might be checked later
if we want to have it fixed, please double check if my claim is
correct. If a list
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 11:11:42 +0100
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 09:22:45AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 12:44:14 +0800
> > Paul Wise wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 11:20 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > > I might need
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 09:22:45AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 12:44:14 +0800
> Paul Wise wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 11:20 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> >
> > > I might need to brush up on my Perl and make a patch for lintian
> > > which downloads the sec
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 12:44:14 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 11:20 +, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > I might need to brush up on my Perl and make a patch for lintian
> > which downloads the sec tracker JSON and checks the CVE list in the
> > .changes file - warnings from lintian
On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 11:20 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> I might need to brush up on my Perl and make a patch for lintian which
> downloads the sec tracker JSON and checks the CVE list in the .changes
> file - warnings from lintian are more likely to get fixed prior to
> upload. Depends if you
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 05:21:40PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 11:20:16AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Hi Salvatore,
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:10:15 +0100
> > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >
> > > > So for that epiphany tracker, there
Hi Neil,
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 11:20:16AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:10:15 +0100
> Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> > > So for that epiphany tracker, there is a typo in the d.changelog -
> > > the automated link for CVE-2021-4508 is a 404.
> > >
>
Hi Salvatore,
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:10:15 +0100
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > So for that epiphany tracker, there is a typo in the d.changelog -
> > the automated link for CVE-2021-4508 is a 404.
> >
> > I've updated the script to catch this and report the error. From the
> >
Hi Neil,
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 02:13:38PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:30:36 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso
> wrote:
> > Hi Neil,
> >
> > Btw, if you want "real" cases why not to do automatic merges:
> >
Hi Salvatore,
On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:30:36 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> Btw, if you want "real" cases why not to do automatic merges:
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1287752/accepted-epiphany-browser-412-1-source-into-unstable/
> typo in CVE, and
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
