On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 11:39:37AM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> sudo currently FTBFS on non-linux architectures
>
> On hurd, it fails in the tests
>
> On kfreebsd, the attached patch fixes the compilation (that should
> probably be reported upstream), but it still fails in the tests
Does t
On 3 Feb 2022, at 13:37, Marc Haber wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> This will be the bugreport we will use to investgate the failing tests.
>
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 11:39:37AM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
>> On hurd, it fails in the tests
>>
>> On kfreebsd,
>
> (...)
Le 3/02/22 à 17:39, Marc Haber a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 11:39:37AM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
On kfreebsd, the attached patch fixes the compilation (that should
probably be reported upstream), but it still fails in the tests
Can you please try the following upstream patch instead
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 11:39:37AM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> On kfreebsd, the attached patch fixes the compilation (that should
> probably be reported upstream), but it still fails in the tests
Can you please try the following upstream patch instead and report back?
https://www.sudo.ws/r
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
thanks
This will be the bugreport we will use to investgate the failing tests.
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 11:39:37AM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> On hurd, it fails in the tests
>
> On kfreebsd,
(...)
> , but it still fails in the tests
Build log for hurd is here:
Source: sudo
Version: 1.9.9-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hello,
sudo currently FTBFS on non-linux architectures
On hurd, it fails in the tests
On kfreebsd, the attached patch fixes the compilation (that sh
6 matches
Mail list logo
