Bug#1009269: Should sphinx-patchqueue be removed?

2022-04-20 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
severity 1009269 normal reassign 1009269 ftp.debian.org retitle 1009269 RM: sphinx-patchqueue -- RoM; obsolete, no rdeps thx Am Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 06:42:45PM +1000 schrieb Dmitry Smirnov: > On Monday, 11 April 2022 4:28:40 AM AEST Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Source: sphinx-patchqueue > >

Bug#1009269: Should sphinx-patchqueue be removed?

2022-04-20 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Monday, 11 April 2022 4:28:40 AM AEST Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Source: sphinx-patchqueue > Version: 0.5.0-2 > Severity: serious > > Your package came up as a candidate for removal from Debian: > > - Still depends on Python 2 and thus removed from testing since 2019 > - No remaining reverse

Bug#1009269: Should sphinx-patchqueue be removed?

2022-04-10 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Source: sphinx-patchqueue Version: 0.5.0-2 Severity: serious Your package came up as a candidate for removal from Debian: - Still depends on Python 2 and thus removed from testing since 2019 - No remaining reverse dependencies - Last upload in 2015 If you disagree and want to continue to