> Just to add a rather unrelated argument for the nodoc support in apt. apt is
For the record: I wrote nodoc and pkg.apt.nodoxygen support earlier last
month and have it finally proposed earlier today in a MR request…
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/merge_requests/238
Another argument is
Hi,
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 07:48:55 +0200 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
This means
that build dependencies like xsltproc, docbook-xml and docbook-xsl can come
from an existing architecture because both packages are Multi-Arch:foreign.
This is why those build dependencies do not
Quoting David Kalnischkies (2022-04-18 23:16:40)
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 06:50:19PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > I thought docbook* and xsltproc could also be excluded from the
> > Build-Depends, but that triggered some other build failures.
>
> They (alongside po4a) are used to build
On 2022-04-18, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 06:50:19PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> This also allows building functional apt packages with a smaller
>> dependency chain, so might help with bootstrapping efforts too!
>
> Bootstrap usually doesn't care about arch:all
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 06:50:19PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> This also allows building functional apt packages with a smaller
> dependency chain, so might help with bootstrapping efforts too!
Bootstrap usually doesn't care about arch:all packages, so that argument
doesn't work that
Source: apt
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
There are some non-deterministic identifiers that doxygen introduces
into apt's documentation packages:
6 matches
Mail list logo
