Hi,
Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> An alternative would be to check if it’s possible to seek to
> specified positions rather than to the end of file
This should work now, by an attempt of lseek(wanted_size, SEEK_SET) if
lseek(0, SEEK_END) yields failure or 0 size.
(libisoburn commit 0c0d542, libisofs
Hi,
Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> An alternative would be to check if it’s possible to seek to
> specified positions rather than to the end of file; e. g.:
I see at least the problem that the end position of -cut_out
(byte_offset + byte_count + 1) is allowed to be unrealisticly high in
order to simply
> On 2022-04-26, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> TS == Thomas Schmitt wrote:
TS> So if we exclude S_IFSOCK, S_IFLNK, S_IFDIR, S_IFIFO there
TS> remain only S_IFREG, S_IFBLK, S_IFCHR with the latter on Linux
TS> behaving like S_IFREG with 0 bytes of content. (As said on
TS> FreeBSD it could
Hi,
i decided to regard a device with 0 lseekable size as not suitable for
-cut_out. The test for suitable type rejects S_ISDIR, S_ISLNK, S_ISFIFO, and
S_ISSOCK. So if an operating system offers non-POSIX types, it will be
possible to test whether they are elsewise suitable.
Please give the code
Hi,
the plan to allow nearly all file types with -cut_out is dwindeling:
- lseek(SEEK_END) on S_IFCHR /dev/zero returns 0, not -1.
- open() on S_IFIFO blocks (and i don't want to know what it will do
in libisofs). IIRC a successful open() has side effects on the fifo.
- S_IFSOCK fails
Hi,
i wrote:
> > The newest easily compilable and then usable version would be
> > http://www.gnu.org/software/xorriso/xorriso-1.5.5.tar.gz
Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> Not under http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/xorriso/ , though?
1.5.5 is a development snapshot with potentially later changing new
> On 2022-04-24, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Ivan Shmakov wrote:
>> I’m filing this bug against versions from oldstable and stable,
>> for that’s so far the only Debian packages’ versions I’ve tested
>> for this issue.
> As it is about an upstream wish:
> The newest easily compilable
Hi,
Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> I’m filing this bug against versions from oldstable and
> stable, for that’s so far the only Debian packages’ versions
> I’ve tested for this issue.
As it is about an upstream wish:
The newest easily compilable and then usable version would be
Package: xorriso
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Control: found -1 1.5.2-1
[Please do not Cc: me, for I’m “on the list,” so to say, and
I try to reserve my inbox for private communication only.
I’d have set up Mail-Followup-To:, but there doesn’t seem to
be a
9 matches
Mail list logo
