Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/dhcp/-/issues/256
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 16:55 +0200, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> This should be solved from the upstream side. I'll file a bug soon.
Excellent, thanks for that.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
El 20/10/22 a las 15:18, Paul Wise escribió:
> On Wed, 2022-10-19 at 10:31 +0200, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
>
> > Bo Yu, could you please check the attached patch instead?
>
> Personally I prefer my approach for correctness, but including the
> Ubuntu patch would be good to reduce the Ubuntu
On Wed, 2022-10-19 at 10:31 +0200, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> Bo Yu, could you please check the attached patch instead?
Personally I prefer my approach for correctness, but including the
Ubuntu patch would be good to reduce the Ubuntu delta.
> I am afraid that is no longer a possible
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 10:31:38AM +0200, Santiago Ruano Rinc�n wrote:
El 19/10/22 a las 11:29, Paul Wise escribi?:
On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 10:17 +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> Certainly. I have updated the patch with help of Paul Wise.
> But I am not sure I understand it correctly. Yeah, The
El 19/10/22 a las 11:29, Paul Wise escribió:
> On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 10:17 +0800, Bo YU wrote:
>
> > Certainly. I have updated the patch with help of Paul Wise.
> > But I am not sure I understand it correctly. Yeah, The bind.tar.gz keeps
> > itself config.{guess/sub}, so I simply copy these files
On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 10:17 +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> Certainly. I have updated the patch with help of Paul Wise.
> But I am not sure I understand it correctly. Yeah, The bind.tar.gz keeps
> itself config.{guess/sub}, so I simply copy these files from system in
> Makefile.
While that is a minimal
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 03:41:26PM +0200, Santiago Ruano Rinc�n wrote:
Hello Bo YU,
El 10/05/22 a las 21:54, Bo YU escribi?:
[...]
...
```
The full buildd log is here:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=isc-dhcp=riscv64=4.4.3-1=1651855032=0
The attach patch is ok on my
Hello Bo YU,
El 10/05/22 a las 21:54, Bo YU escribió:
> Source: isc-dhcp
> Version: 4.4.3-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: ftbfs patch
> User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: riscv64
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The isc-dhcp package has a ftbfs
* Paul Wise :
> Since isc-dhcp is orphaned upstream, perhaps removing it from Debian is
> the right solution. There was a thread about that on debian-devel:
>
> https://www.isc.org/blogs/dhcp-client-relay-eom/
>
On Tue, 2022-05-10 at 21:54 +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> The attach patch is ok on my localy riscv64 hardware board.
>
> But I am not sure this patch is right or not to fix the issue although
> read through here:
I don't think this is the best way to fix this issue.
dh_autoreconf should already be
Source: isc-dhcp
Version: 4.4.3-1
Severity: normal
Tags: ftbfs patch
User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: riscv64
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
The isc-dhcp package has a ftbfs issue on riscv64:
```
...
UNAME_MACHINE = riscv64
UNAME_RELEASE =
12 matches
Mail list logo
