Bug#1011437: Should bind9-libs be shipped in bookworm?

> On 9. 1. 2023, at 14:50, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > Hi, > >>> not about src:bind9, building the bind9-libs binary package (yes, this is >>> totally confusing, even to Debian tooling) >> I though that had been already removed: >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011538

Bug#1011437: Should bind9-libs be shipped in bookworm?

Hi, not about src:bind9, building the bind9-libs binary package (yes, this is totally confusing, even to Debian tooling) I though that had been already removed: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011538 But I

Bug#1011437: Should bind9-libs be shipped in bookworm?

> On 9. 1. 2023, at 14:34, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > Am 09.01.23 um 14:30 schrieb Ondřej Surý: > > Hi Ondrej, > Looking at #942501 and #942502, the intention seems to be to not ship bind9-libs in bookworm. >>> >>> I agree, Ccing Ondrej who has done the heavy lifting on this

Bug#1011437: Should bind9-libs be shipped in bookworm?

Am 09.01.23 um 14:30 schrieb Ondřej Surý: Hi Ondrej, Looking at #942501 and #942502, the intention seems to be to not ship bind9-libs in bookworm. I agree, Ccing Ondrej who has done the heavy lifting on this package. AFAICT there is no binary reverse dependency in unstable, and #942501

Bug#1011437: Should bind9-libs be shipped in bookworm?

> On 8. 1. 2023, at 21:41, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > On 22/05/22 11:47 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >> Looking at #942501 and #942502, the intention seems to be to not >> ship bind9-libs in bookworm. > > I agree, Ccing Ondrej who has done the heavy lifting on this package. > > AFAICT there is

Bug#1011437: Should bind9-libs be shipped in bookworm?

On 22/05/22 11:47 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Looking at #942501 and #942502, the intention seems to be to not > ship bind9-libs in bookworm. I agree, Ccing Ondrej who has done the heavy lifting on this package. AFAICT there is no binary reverse dependency in unstable, and #942501 "just" needs a

Bug#1011437: Should bind9-libs be shipped in bookworm?

Source: bind9-libs Version: 1:9.11.19+dfsg-2.1 Severity: serious Tags: bookwoem sid Control: block -1 by 942502 942501 Looking at #942501 and #942502, the intention seems to be to not ship bind9-libs in bookworm.