Bug#1012250: Fixing CI bugs for a package on the REJECT list

2022-10-01 Thread Jeff
Hi Paul, On 01/10/2022 11:06, Paul Gevers wrote: I have triggered several runs (about 15 or so) and they all passed. I have removed the block and am lowering the severity of this bug for now. What bothers me about this is that these flaky tests do not occur with the buildd hosts: Well, the

Bug#1012250: Fixing CI bugs for a package on the REJECT list

2022-10-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: severity -1 important Hi Jeff, On 27-09-2022 08:17, Jeff wrote: Please trigger a new run. I can't add more diagnostics until I know where. I have triggered several runs (about 15 or so) and they all passed. I have removed the block and am lowering the severity of this bug for now.

Bug#1012250: Fixing CI bugs for a package on the REJECT list

2022-09-30 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Jeff, On 27-09-2022 08:17, Jeff wrote: I also offer to run the test (once or twice) manually and get information out of the testbed, if you tell me the exact commands you want me to run in the testbed. Please trigger a new run. I can't add more diagnostics until I know where. Done so a

Bug#1012250: Fixing CI bugs for a package on the REJECT list

2022-09-27 Thread Jeff
Hi Paul, On 26/09/2022 19:46, Paul Gevers wrote: The bug has a user specified for the usertag and explicitly mentions: """ Don't hesitate to reach out if you need help [...] """ So, either using debian...@lists.debian.org or the submitter's address (mine) seems appropriate. In which case, I

Bug#1012250: Fixing CI bugs for a package on the REJECT list

2022-09-26 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Jeff, On 26-09-2022 12:53, Jeff wrote: Short of closing #1012250, how do I get CI pipeline to pick up gscan2pdf again to debug the flaky tests? I'd appreciate any pointers. The bug has a user specified for the usertag and explicitly mentions: """ Don't hesitate to reach out if you need