Bug#1012987: libpodofo: ftbfs with GCC-12

2022-08-19 Thread yokota
Hi Nicholas > It looks like the a "Source" or "Forwarded" DEP3 header with a link to > Pino's pull request is missing. > https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep3 I was updated my salsa merge request. https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libpodofo/-/merge_requests/2 -- YOKOTA Hiroshi

Bug#1012987: libpodofo: ftbfs with GCC-12

2022-08-18 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Mattia and Yokota-san, On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 15:50:48 +0200 Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > See also me asking upstream for a real patch here: > https://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/mailman/podofo-users/thread/Yt0dvCmE/ISNNwI3%40mapreri.org/#msg37684942 > > At the very least, I'd prefer fedora's patch

Bug#1012987: libpodofo: ftbfs with GCC-12

2022-07-26 Thread yokota
Hello, > I rewrite my patch to enable all string test. New patch was already uploaded to salsa. https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libpodofo/-/merge_requests/2 -- YOKOTA

Bug#1012987: libpodofo: ftbfs with GCC-12

2022-07-26 Thread yokota
Hello Mattia, > At the very least, I'd prefer fedora's patch better since it disable > specific tests and not the whole file the failing test lives in… > But I really don't like either. I rewrite my patch to enable all string test. -- YOKOTA

Bug#1012987: libpodofo: ftbfs with GCC-12

2022-07-25 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hello, On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 10:45:49PM +0900, yokota wrote: > Hello Debian libpodofo maintainer, > I maintain Debian Calibre which uses libpodofo. > > I make FTBFS fix to Debian libpodofo at: > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libpodofo/-/merge_requests/2 > > Please examine this merge

Bug#1012987: libpodofo: ftbfs with GCC-12

2022-07-25 Thread yokota
Hello Debian libpodofo maintainer, I maintain Debian Calibre which uses libpodofo. I make FTBFS fix to Debian libpodofo at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libpodofo/-/merge_requests/2 Please examine this merge request. -- YOKOTA