On 11/17/22 08:25, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Dear Sebastian,
Il 17/11/22 05:14, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto:
On 11/16/22 21:14, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
Would you be willing to accept this merge proposal?
https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/lerc/-/merge_requests/1
During Ubuntu's Main
Dear Sebastian,
Il 17/11/22 05:14, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto:
On 11/16/22 21:14, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
Would you be willing to accept this merge proposal?
https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/lerc/-/merge_requests/1
During Ubuntu's Main Inclusion review, it was requested that the
On 11/16/22 21:14, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
Would you be willing to accept this merge proposal?
https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/lerc/-/merge_requests/1
During Ubuntu's Main Inclusion review, it was requested that the build
should fail on Ubuntu if symbols disappear.
I'm conflicted about
Would you be willing to accept this merge proposal?
https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/lerc/-/merge_requests/1
During Ubuntu's Main Inclusion review, it was requested that the build
should fail on Ubuntu if symbols disappear.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
Package: lerc
Version: 3.0+ds-1
The package uses
override_dh_makeshlibs:
dh_makeshlibs -- -v$(UPSTREAM_VERSION) -c0
Any reason to use -c0 there? Shouldn't it fail the build to protect
against accidental changes?
Cheers,
5 matches
Mail list logo