On Sun, 17 Jul 2022, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > You most likely want some pinning.
>
> I've never found pinning to be of much use. When I did have an actual use for
[…]
No, not that. You need it to get apt to not even consider systemd
installable.
> wanted. Far more work than it was worth - I ende
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 04:01:38AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2022, Craig Sanders wrote:
>
> > and, of course:
> >
> > apt-mark hold sysvinit-core
> >
> > To prevent systemd from being auto-installed in some future upgrade.
>
> You most likely want some pinning.
I've never
On Sun, 17 Jul 2022, Craig Sanders wrote:
> and, of course:
>
> apt-mark hold sysvinit-core
>
> To prevent systemd from being auto-installed in some future upgrade.
You most likely want some pinning. Just held in dpkg or even marked
as XB-Important: yes often brings apt to tears in sid, i.e
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 02:35:33PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 11:07:47PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > A little more investigation reveals that it's udev.
> >
> > udev 2.51.3-1 (Wed, 13 Jul 2022 23:05:40 +0200) now depends on 'systemd |
> > systemd-tmpfiles'.
>
> Great.
Adam,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 03:32:55PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> The _correct_ way would be to write that dependency as
> 'systemd-tmpfiles | systemd' which is no-op on systemd installs but
> avoids init switch elsewhere.
Thanks. That is a good suggestion.
Michael,
I know this issue was r
Craig,
Thanks.
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 11:07:47PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> A little more investigation reveals that it's udev.
>
> udev 2.51.3-1 (Wed, 13 Jul 2022 23:05:40 +0200) now depends on 'systemd |
> systemd-tmpfiles'.
Great. systemd-tmpfiles is a virtual package that is also provi
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 11:07:47PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> The machine is running sid, so this was just a routine dist-upgrade.
>
> > I can't immediately see the package that might be causing the conflict here.
> A little more investigation reveals that it's udev.
>
> udev 2.51.3-1 (Wed, 13
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 10:00:27AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> What release are you upgrading from an to?
Version of what? There's no new version of elogind. That's kind of what my
bug report is asking for.
The machine is running sid, so this was just a routine dist-upgrade.
> On Sat, Jul 16,
Craig,
Thanks for this.
What release are you upgrading from an to?
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 06:34:35PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> Package: elogind
> Version: 246.9.1-1+debian1
>
> I don't know if a newer version of elogind would help here, but it
> probably wouldn't hurt. elogind in debian ha
Package: elogind
Version: 246.9.1-1+debian1
I don't know if a newer version of elogind would help here, but it
probably wouldn't hurt. elogind in debian hasn't been updated since
Dec 23.
# apt -u dist-upgade
[...]
The following packages will be REMOVED:
alsa-firmware-loaders bluez brasero fwupd
10 matches
Mail list logo
