On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 03:00:32PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> I haven't looked deeply into this, bit for armhf using GDC is the intended
> choice - it has way fewer bugs than LDC,
If binaries compiled by ldc simply do not work on armhf, maybe you should
consider to restrict archs in ldc packa
Hi!
I haven't looked deeply into this, bit for armhf using GDC is the intended
choice - it has way fewer bugs than LDC, which generally seems to work
better on 64bit architectures. That's why this was changed in the past (so
at least of stuff compiles with gdc, the resulting binary will work).
I'm
Package: dh-dlang
Version: 0.6.5
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: m...@debian.org
Hi,
dh-dlang seems to export flags for armhf incorrectly. ldc is
supported on armhf and hence this should be exported if available
however dh-dlang does not seem to honor that[1]
Furthermore, it has a snippet in t
3 matches
Mail list logo