On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 10:19:18 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I think we'll probably want to swap from a mozjs91-based gjs to a
> mozjs102-based gjs either before or during the mutter/Shell transition
> (#1018118)
I'm having trouble finding the right arguments for `dak rm -n`, but I
think the
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 06:51:47 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> This will also affect Cinnamon once Cinnamon gets around to building
> their cjs fork of gjs with a newer mozjs.
cjs is currently still on mozjs78, so I would not expect this to happen
soon, and I think it should be treated as a
This will also affect Cinnamon once Cinnamon gets around to building
their cjs fork of gjs with a newer mozjs.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 06:40:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> For avoidance of doubt, I didn't ACK or NACK the transition. I just wanted
> to answer Simon's question about the course of solutions.
I think we'll probably want to swap from a mozjs91-based gjs to a
mozjs102-based gjs either before or
Hi,
On 30-08-2022 22:20, Paul Gevers wrote:
[...]
For avoidance of doubt, I didn't ACK or NACK the transition. I just
wanted to answer Simon's question about the course of solutions.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Simon, all,
On 30-08-2022 14:48, Simon McVittie wrote:
If armel is a candidate for being a release architecture, then I think
that leaves two-and-a-half options:
In the last couple of releases, we have been bad at taking decisions on
this front, so lets assume it is (although this issue
On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 13:14:33 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Simon McVittie dijo [Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:19:30AM +0100]:
> > Is armel a realistic candidate for being a Debian 12 release
> > architecture?
>
> I do not feel armel systems are hard to come by, nor marginal in the
> amount of users
Simon McVittie dijo [Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:19:30AM +0100]:
> Obviously that's quite a bit of churn, mostly in packages that, in
> practice, have never been useful to run on the 2009-2010 plug computers
> that seem to be the main use-case for armel.
>
> Is armel a realistic candidate for being a
thanks and sorry for the stupid question :)
dpkg-query -W libgjs0g
libgjs0g:arm64 1.73.1-1
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 3:02 PM Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 14:24:46 +0200, Renato Gallo wrote:
> > Linux raspberrypi 6.0.0-rc1-v8+ #2 SMP PREEMPT Fri Aug 19 14:48:09 CEST
> 2022
> >
On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 14:24:46 +0200, Renato Gallo wrote:
> Linux raspberrypi 6.0.0-rc1-v8+ #2 SMP PREEMPT Fri Aug 19 14:48:09 CEST 2022
> aarch64 GNU/Linux
> I am using gnome on a raspberrypi4 8GB ram (arm64) without problems.
If you are using the arm64 or armhf architecture, as you should be
stupid question .
Linux raspberrypi 6.0.0-rc1-v8+ #2 SMP PREEMPT Fri Aug 19 14:48:09 CEST
2022 aarch64 GNU/Linux
I am using gnome on a raspberrypi4 8GB ram (arm64) without problems.
Will this removal affect me ?
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 12:21 PM Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package:
Package: rele...@debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org
The plan is for Debian 12 to release with GNOME 43, which is currently in
beta upstream. Beta versions of
12 matches
Mail list logo
