Package: bluez-alsa-utils
Version: 3.0.0-2
I'm very happy to finally see BlueALSA provided by the Debian package
repository, many thanks to the maintainers!
It is probably too late for my suggestion, and maybe there is a specific
reason why the service is called differently compared to upstream
source? https://github.com/Arkq/bluez-alsa/tree/master/misc/systemd
However, to avoid inconsistency, I suggest to rename the service
"bluez-alsa.service" to "bluealsa.service", along with
"/etc/default/bluez-alsa" to "/etc/default/bluealsa", to match the
binary/executable name, the suggested user and group names, the ALSA
plugin and the service in upstream sources. As well "BlueALSA" is the
name of the product, according to its author(s).
Other distros have created packages from it called "bluealsa", which
could be taken even as argument to rename the package itself as well,
but for this is even more likely to late ;).
Best regards,
Micha
