Bug#1022571: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, Am Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 02:28:37PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 11:43, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I was motivated for this patch by Diane's statement on the Debian Med > > matrix channel that dask and dask.distributed are interconnected. If > > the autopkgtest on

Bug#1022571: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-25 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Rebecca, Andreas On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 11:43, Andreas Tille wrote: > I was motivated for this patch by Diane's statement on the Debian Med > matrix channel that dask and dask.distributed are interconnected. If > the autopkgtest on Salsa CI[4] would have passed I would have uploaded. We will

Bug#1022571: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham Am Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:50:41PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs: > > On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 00:16, Rebecca N. Palmer > wrote: > > The remaining autopkgtest failures blocking pandas are: > > - dipy/amd64 and snakemake/i386 look like random flakiness: please retry > > them. (I think DMs

Bug#1022571: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-24 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Rebecca On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 00:16, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > The remaining autopkgtest failures blocking pandas are: > - dipy/amd64 and snakemake/i386 look like random flakiness: please retry > them. (I think DMs can't use the self-service interface.) Or for dipy, > see #1029533 for a po

Bug#1022571: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-23 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
The remaining autopkgtest failures blocking pandas are: - dipy/amd64 and snakemake/i386 look like random flakiness: please retry them. (I think DMs can't use the self-service interface.) Or for dipy, see #1029533 for a possible fix. - python-xarray/i386 looks like xarray not pandas: see #1004

Bug#1022571: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 01:44:40PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs: > Hi Rebecca > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 10:30, Rebecca N. Palmer > wrote: > > Should this go ahead before the freeze? I think yes if the new dask > > works, but am open to disagreement. > > Please go ahead. With numpy 1:1.24.1-2 bu

Bug#1022571: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-09 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Rebecca On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 10:30, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > Should this go ahead before the freeze? I think yes if the new dask > works, but am open to disagreement. Please go ahead. With numpy 1:1.24.1-2 built on all release architectures, now is a good time. Regards Graham

Bug#1022571: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-09 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
skbio is fixed, ulmo is maybe fixed but untested. dask is unclear (see #1027254 for details): it looks like it's probably fixable, but I don't have an actual working fix yet. There has been no response from its maintainers.

Bug#1022571: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-07 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 06/01/2023 09:16, Nilesh Patra wrote: The version of dask is same since few months. What do you mean by new dask? Current Debian dask (2022.02) fails its tests with pandas 1.5 (#1025393), and the obvious way to fix that (and #1027254) is to update it to current upstream dask (2022.12), but

Bug#1022571: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-06 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 6 January 2023 1:26:05 pm IST, "Rebecca N. Palmer" wrote: >Should this go ahead before the freeze? I think yes if the new dask works, >but am open to disagreement. The version of dask is same since few months. What do you mean by new dask? >skbio #1017574 This has been fixed in latest

Bug#1022571: transition: pandas 1.3 -> 1.5

2023-01-06 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Should this go ahead before the freeze? I think yes if the new dask works, but am open to disagreement. Issues this would fix: python3.11 #1023965: We're currently ignoring these test failures. Mystery autopkgtest failure (fails without any listed individual test failure, started 2022-11-13)