Hi Graham,
Am Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 02:28:37PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 11:43, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I was motivated for this patch by Diane's statement on the Debian Med
> > matrix channel that dask and dask.distributed are interconnected. If
> > the autopkgtest on
Hi Rebecca, Andreas
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 11:43, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I was motivated for this patch by Diane's statement on the Debian Med
> matrix channel that dask and dask.distributed are interconnected. If
> the autopkgtest on Salsa CI[4] would have passed I would have uploaded.
We will
Hi Graham
Am Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:50:41PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
>
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 00:16, Rebecca N. Palmer
> wrote:
> > The remaining autopkgtest failures blocking pandas are:
> > - dipy/amd64 and snakemake/i386 look like random flakiness: please retry
> > them. (I think DMs
Hi Rebecca
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 00:16, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> The remaining autopkgtest failures blocking pandas are:
> - dipy/amd64 and snakemake/i386 look like random flakiness: please retry
> them. (I think DMs can't use the self-service interface.) Or for dipy,
> see #1029533 for a po
The remaining autopkgtest failures blocking pandas are:
- dipy/amd64 and snakemake/i386 look like random flakiness: please retry
them. (I think DMs can't use the self-service interface.) Or for dipy,
see #1029533 for a possible fix.
- python-xarray/i386 looks like xarray not pandas: see #1004
Am Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 01:44:40PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> Hi Rebecca
>
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 10:30, Rebecca N. Palmer
> wrote:
> > Should this go ahead before the freeze? I think yes if the new dask
> > works, but am open to disagreement.
>
> Please go ahead. With numpy 1:1.24.1-2 bu
Hi Rebecca
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 10:30, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> Should this go ahead before the freeze? I think yes if the new dask
> works, but am open to disagreement.
Please go ahead. With numpy 1:1.24.1-2 built on all release
architectures, now is a good time.
Regards
Graham
skbio is fixed, ulmo is maybe fixed but untested.
dask is unclear (see #1027254 for details): it looks like it's probably
fixable, but I don't have an actual working fix yet. There has been no
response from its maintainers.
On 06/01/2023 09:16, Nilesh Patra wrote:
The version of dask is same since few months. What do you mean by new dask?
Current Debian dask (2022.02) fails its tests with pandas 1.5
(#1025393), and the obvious way to fix that (and #1027254) is to update
it to current upstream dask (2022.12), but
On 6 January 2023 1:26:05 pm IST, "Rebecca N. Palmer"
wrote:
>Should this go ahead before the freeze? I think yes if the new dask works,
>but am open to disagreement.
The version of dask is same since few months. What do you mean by new dask?
>skbio #1017574
This has been fixed in latest
Should this go ahead before the freeze? I think yes if the new dask
works, but am open to disagreement.
Issues this would fix:
python3.11 #1023965: We're currently ignoring these test failures.
Mystery autopkgtest failure (fails without any listed individual test
failure, started 2022-11-13)
11 matches
Mail list logo