On 2022-10-31 21:20, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 = confirmed
>
> On 2022-10-30 19:06:09 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2022-10-30 17:10, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > Control: forwarded -1
> > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.36.html
> > > Control:
Control: tags -1 = confirmed
On 2022-10-30 19:06:09 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2022-10-30 17:10, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: forwarded -1
> > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.36.html
> > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> >
> > On 2022-10-27 21:36:11 +0200,
On 2022-10-30 17:10, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.36.html
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On 2022-10-27 21:36:11 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 05:10:13PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>...
> Speaking of GCC 12 … #1022991 seems to have a first patch available
> upstream. Is there any chance that we could start this transition
> together with a fix for that bug?
IMHO it would be better to have 2.35 uploaded with
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.36.html
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2022-10-27 21:36:11 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gl...@lists.debian.org
Dear release team,
I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.36. It has been
available in experimental for a bit more than one month
6 matches
Mail list logo
