Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf

2022-11-24 Thread GCS
Hi Sebastian, On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 9:03 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2022-11-21 20:42:41 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Please go ahead > > protobuf's autopkgtests are failing. Could you please take a look at > them? Thanks Indeed, my bad. Fixed and uploaded. Regards, Laszlo/GCS

Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf

2022-11-24 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 11/24/22 21:03, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: protobuf's autopkgtests are failing. Could you please take a look at them? Thanks Patch available in: https://bugs.debian.org/1024677 Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E8

Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf

2022-11-24 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi László On 2022-11-21 20:42:41 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 = confirmed > > On 2022-11-10 23:10:29 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: block -1 by 1022248 1018945 > > > > On 2022-11-06 09:08:57 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org

Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf

2022-11-21 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 = confirmed On 2022-11-10 23:10:29 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: block -1 by 1022248 1018945 > > On 2022-11-06 09:08:57 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertag

Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf

2022-11-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: block -1 by 1022248 1018945 On 2022-11-06 09:08:57 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi RMs, > > There's a long awaited transition of Protobuf. It clashes with the >

Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf

2022-11-07 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: László Böszörményi > On the other hand I'm done with the rebuilds and patched all issues, > this transition may start immediately at your decision. The only > downside is that the Sid version of cura-engine is FTBFS and to fix > it, the libarcus transition (only affecting this package) will nee

Bug#1023535: transition: protobuf

2022-11-06 Thread GCS
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi RMs, There's a long awaited transition of Protobuf. It clashes with the ruby3.1-default transition, but as I know its rebuilds are just starting[1]. On the other hand I'm done with th