Hello,
On Sat 09 Sep 2023 at 03:16pm -07, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I looked at this snippet and I think it has worse problems than the use of
> install -s. For example, it predates the existence of dpkg-buildflags,
> which would also handle noopt. I'm also dubious that it serves any useful
>
Please remove the following email address: e.little...@gmail.com
On Sat, Sep 9, 2023 at 6:18 PM Russ Allbery wrote:
> Enrico Zini writes:
>
> > Hello, and thank you for maintaining the Policy!
>
> > Policy paragraph 4.9.1 has an example debian/rules which contains these
> > lines:
>
> >
On Sat, 09 Sep 2023 15:16:10 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I'm therefore going to propose fixing this bug with the following patch,
> which is more aggressive than you propose.
>
> I think this is informative rather than normative and therefore
> technically doesn't require seconds, but I'll give
Enrico Zini writes:
> Hello, and thank you for maintaining the Policy!
> Policy paragraph 4.9.1 has an example debian/rules which contains these
> lines:
>INSTALL_PROGRAM = $(INSTALL) -p-o root -g root -m 755
>ifeq (,$(filter nostrip,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 02:14:32PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 4.6.1.1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello, and thank you for maintaining the Policy!
>
> Policy paragraph 4.9.1 has an example debian/rules which contains these
> lines:
>
>INSTALL_PROGRAM =
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.6.1.1
Severity: normal
Hello, and thank you for maintaining the Policy!
Policy paragraph 4.9.1 has an example debian/rules which contains these
lines:
INSTALL_PROGRAM = $(INSTALL) -p-o root -g root -m 755
ifeq (,$(filter
6 matches
Mail list logo
