Control: tags -1 pending patch
Hi all,
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:27:27 +0100 Andreas Henriksson
wrote:
> So, please use this hunk instead. It compiles for me on amd64 and 32-bit hppa.
>
> export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = future=+lfs
> export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wall
Hi,
Is the issue that with older glibc versions, it was silently casted
to a 32 bit value, but now that glibc supports 64 bit, it knows
it can't represent it, and gives an error?
Maybe for bookworm, we should just ignore the test error?
Kurt
Just noticed this bug.
The discussion in this bug makes me worry that people do not fully
understand the implications of enabling 64-bit time and large file
system support respectively.
It's great to see people starting to care about this issue and fix
things (it's overdue), but I'm just chiming
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 18:27:27 +0100 Andreas Henriksson wrote:
>
> export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = future=+lfs
> export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wall -Wno-analyzer-null-argument
Might be useful to add a comment here saying:
# Workaround gnulib issue: The below three lines can be
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 02:26:50AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> Hi David & Andreas,
>
> On 1/28/23 12:10, David Prévot wrote:
> > Le Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 01:24:37AM +0100, Helge Deller a écrit :
> > > On Sat, 14 Jan 2023 20:38:38 +0100 Andreas Henriksson
> > > wrote:
> > > > Here's a
Hi David & Andreas,
On 1/28/23 12:10, David Prévot wrote:
Le Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 01:24:37AM +0100, Helge Deller a écrit :
On Sat, 14 Jan 2023 20:38:38 +0100 Andreas Henriksson wrote:
Here's a slightly different patch to implement basically the same thing
Unfortunately, even if both
Hello taffit,
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 12:10:53PM +0100, David Prévot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 01:24:37AM +0100, Helge Deller a écrit :
> > On Sat, 14 Jan 2023 20:38:38 +0100 Andreas Henriksson
> > wrote:
> > > Here's a slightly different patch to implement basically the same
Hi,
Le Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 01:24:37AM +0100, Helge Deller a écrit :
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2023 20:38:38 +0100 Andreas Henriksson
> wrote:
> > Here's a slightly different patch to implement basically the same thing
>
> Yes, I like this patch better too.
Unfortunately, even if both patches allow me
On Sat, 14 Jan 2023 20:38:38 +0100 Andreas Henriksson wrote:
Here's a slightly different patch to implement basically the same thing
Yes, I like this patch better too.
Helge
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 09:13:44AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> Package: tar
> Version: 1.34+dfsg-1.1
> Tags: hppa, patch, ftbfs, lfs
[...]
> I've found, that changing the line 12 in debian/rules from
> CPPFLAGS = `dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS`
> to:
> CPPFLAGS = `dpkg-buildflags --get
Package: tar
Version: 1.34+dfsg-1.1
Tags: hppa, patch, ftbfs, lfs
I wondered why tar now suddenly fails to build on those platforms.
Testcase # 151 does create files whith access dates which are outside of the
reach for
32-bit plaforms with a default of 32-bit timestamps in glibc.
This does
11 matches
Mail list logo
