Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,


So, I have noticed that not much has happened with my package in the last couple of days...
Which is a shame, because I still think that my project is AWESOME. :)

Again, it is a MP3 player. Yes, you have a lot of them in the packages, and this one is not that "Different". It is more of a REIMAGINING of xmms. Afaik, said layer was a fork from x11amp,
which was the first Linux Version of WinAmp.

It was highly customizable, and a lot of people did that, which you can see here: https://skins.webamp.org. My player d11amp can handle those, and thus looks badass-oldskool.


The second point I would like to make about this player is its license model. It relies on GTK4, which stand firmly on the ground of LGPL. There are other players, which are using a different frontend. And those sometimes have a Semi-Commercial License. (You know what I mean. ;) )

With d11amp, even the default skin is EXPLICITLY CC-0, so even screenshots are not a problem.

So, to sum up:


1. Looks cool
2. License model is open source friendly


On top of that: Isn't the whole point of Open Source to give users the freedom to choose? Please see d11amp as one more option. I hope you find that it deserves a place in your
collection one day.




I am looking for a sponsor for my package "d11amp":


* Package name : d11amp
Version : 0.59-1
Upstream contact : Thomas Dettbarn <det...@dettus.net>
* URL : https://www.dettus.net/d11amp/
* License : BSD-2-Clause
* Vcs : https://github.com/dettus/d11amp/
Section : sound

The source builds the following binary packages:

d11amp - Simple MP3 player

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/d11amp/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/d11amp/d11amp_0.59-1.dsc

Changes for the initial release:

d11amp (0.59-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* initial release.
* Closes: #1025668

Regards,


Thomas

Reply via email to