Bug#1026639: rhino FTBFS

2023-02-13 Thread Markus Koschany
I believe I have corrected all regressions except of one in closure-compiler which I will fix later today (renamed class). It turned out that I had to update the Manifest file and include another META-INF file, javax.script.ScriptEngineFactory, to solve some FTBFS in reverse-dependencies. This is

Bug#1026639: rhino FTBFS

2023-02-13 Thread Markus Koschany
Am Montag, dem 13.02.2023 um 11:04 +0100 schrieb Markus Koschany: > preserve-backward-compatibility.patch To answer my own question. Yes, this is still needed otherwise closure-compiler starts to FTBFS signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#1026639: rhino FTBFS

2023-02-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 11:04:38AM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: >... > I don't really like to use gradle for a key package. >... FTR, gradle is already a key package: libxi -> asciidoc -> fop -> mockito -> gradle > Markus cu Adrian

Bug#1026639: rhino FTBFS

2023-02-13 Thread Markus Koschany
Am Montag, dem 13.02.2023 um 12:14 +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 11:04:38AM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > > ... > > I don't really like to use gradle for a key package. > > ... > > FTR, gradle is already a key package: > libxi -> asciidoc -> fop -> mockito -> gradle I

Bug#1026639: rhino FTBFS

2023-02-13 Thread Markus Koschany
Am Montag, dem 13.02.2023 um 09:33 +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > I don't think this should be assigned to rhino. ckeditor should > open the internal packages it touches. I'm currently working on rhino. I have packaged 1.7.14 now. I haven't looked into ckeditor yet but it seems we have to

Bug#1026639: rhino FTBFS

2023-02-13 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
I don't think this should be assigned to rhino. ckeditor should open the internal packages it touches.

Bug#1026639: rhino FTBFS

2023-02-12 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: owner -1 ! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part