Package: frescobaldi
Version: 3.2+ds1-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Forwarded: https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/issues/1453
X-Debbugs-Cc: f...@debian.org

Launching frescobaldi 3.2+ds1-1 on Debian bookworm/sid with Python 3.11
fails with the following error:

    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "/home/foka/git/frescobaldi/frescobaldi_app/view.py", line 107, in 
event
        if ev.type() == QEvent.KeyPress:
           ^^^^^^^
    TypeError: a member of enum 'StandardKey' is expected not 'QEvent'
    Aborted

A temporary workaround is to run frescobaldi with an older Python
version, e.g.:

    $ python3.10 /usr/bin/frescobaldi

The issue was reported to upstream by Fedora users/developers back in
October 2022, and there is a pull request that may resolve the problem;
see https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/issues/1453


-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers stable-security
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), 
(1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.0.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages frescobaldi depends on:
ii  python3                    3.11.1-1
ii  python3-ly                 0.9.7-1
ii  python3-poppler-qt5        21.3.0-2
ii  python3-pygame             2.1.2+dfsg-5
ii  python3-pyqt5              5.15.7+dfsg-3+b1
ii  python3-pyqt5.qtsvg        5.15.7+dfsg-3+b1
ii  python3-pyqt5.qtwebengine  5.15.6-1
ii  python3-pyqt5.qtwebkit     5.15.7+dfsg-3+b1
ii  python3-qpageview          0.6.2-4
ii  tango-icon-theme           0.8.90-11

Versions of packages frescobaldi recommends:
ii  fluidsynth  2.3.1-1
ii  lilypond    2.22.2-1

Versions of packages frescobaldi suggests:
ii  hyphen-en-us [hyphen-hyphenation-patterns]  2.8.8-7
ii  lilypond-doc                                2.22.2-1

-- no debconf information

Reply via email to