On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 21:41:04 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I updated lintian on the worker. The results will get updated over the
> next few days (probably 3 to 5 days).
Thanks a lot! :-)
[...]
> I'll check again in a few days and close when the data is migrated.
Sounds good.
Bye!
--
Hi,
On 30/01/23 at 21:58 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 21:14:53 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > Hi Francesco,
>
> Hi Lucas! :-)
>
> >
> > On 30/01/23 at 20:45 +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> [...]
> > > Why is UDD outdated w.r.t. the lintian version?
> > >
On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 21:14:53 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi Francesco,
Hi Lucas! :-)
>
> On 30/01/23 at 20:45 +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
[...]
> > Why is UDD outdated w.r.t. the lintian version?
> > Shouldn't UDD be aware of the version currently in testing, or maybe
> >
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 09:14:53PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Any reason in particular you need the latest version?
because lintian 2.116.x is much better than 2.115.x ;)
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP:
Hi Francesco,
On 30/01/23 at 20:45 +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: udd
>
> Hi!
>
> In the [UDD Lintian report] for my package, I read:
>
> [...]
> | The most recent lintian version known
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
Hi!
In the [UDD Lintian report] for my package, I read:
[...]
| The most recent lintian version known by UDD is 2.115.3
[...]
[UDD Lintian report]:
6 matches
Mail list logo