Bug#1030096: Any ideas Re: #1030096 dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail ?

2023-02-07 Thread Diane Trout
On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 07:31 +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > On 07/02/2023 03:20, Diane Trout wrote: > > What's your test environment like? > > Salsa CI. > > > I don't think head is hugely different from what was released in - > > 1. > > > > The diff looks like Andreas adjusted the dask depende

Bug#1030096: Any ideas Re: #1030096 dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail ?

2023-02-06 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 07/02/2023 03:20, Diane Trout wrote: What's your test environment like? Salsa CI. I don't think head is hugely different from what was released in -1. The diff looks like Andreas adjusted the dask dependency version, configured a salsa CI run, and added some upstream metadata files That

Bug#1030096: Any ideas Re: #1030096 dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail ?

2023-02-06 Thread Diane Trout
On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 21:39 +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > I agree that xfailing the tests *may* be a reasonable solution.  I'm > only saying that it should be done by someone with more idea than me > of > whether these particular tests are important, because blindly > xfailing > everything t

Bug#1030096: Any ideas Re: #1030096 dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail ?

2023-02-06 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
I agree that xfailing the tests *may* be a reasonable solution. I'm only saying that it should be done by someone with more idea than me of whether these particular tests are important, because blindly xfailing everything that fails is effectively not having tests. If we do choose that approa

Bug#1030096: Any ideas Re: #1030096 dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail ?

2023-02-06 Thread Diane Trout
On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 11:13 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Rebecca, > > Am Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 07:59:17AM + schrieb Rebecca N. Palmer: > > (Background: the pandas + dask transition broke dask.distributed > > and it was > > hence removed from testing; I didn't notice at the time that if we >

Bug#1030096: Any ideas Re: #1030096 dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail ?

2023-02-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Rebecca, Am Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 07:59:17AM + schrieb Rebecca N. Palmer: > (Background: the pandas + dask transition broke dask.distributed and it was > hence removed from testing; I didn't notice at the time that if we don't get > it back in we lose Spyder.) as far as I know Diane has put

Bug#1030096: Any ideas Re: #1030096 dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail ?

2023-02-06 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
(Background: the pandas + dask transition broke dask.distributed and it was hence removed from testing; I didn't notice at the time that if we don't get it back in we lose Spyder.) On 05/02/2023 21:44, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: I currently have this in a state where it sometimes succeeds and so