On 19/02/23 at 14:06 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> El 19/2/23 a las 10:03, Nilesh Patra escribió:
> > @Santiago, sorry about pulling you into a random thread.
> > If you have some time, could you please see if this is
> > reproducible at your end? And if so, could you, like the previous time,
> >
El 19/2/23 a las 10:03, Nilesh Patra escribió:
@Santiago, sorry about pulling you into a random thread.
If you have some time, could you please see if this is
reproducible at your end? And if so, could you, like the previous time, give me
access to a machine where this might be a bit more
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 08:53:05AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 07:47:47 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Source: poetry
> > > Version: 1.3.2+dfsg-3
> > > Severity: serious
> > > Justification: FTBFS
> > > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> > > User: lu...@debian.org
> > >
Hi Nilesh,
On 19/02/23 at 01:13 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> Control: severity -1 important
>
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 07:47:47 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: poetry
> > Version: 1.3.2+dfsg-3
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: FTBFS
> >
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: severity -1 important
Hi Lucas,
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 07:47:47 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: poetry
> Version: 1.3.2+dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20230216
Source: poetry
Version: 1.3.2+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230216 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
6 matches
Mail list logo