Bug#1031793: dgit: Treat single-debian-patch as implying --quilt=single

2024-04-11 Thread Ian Jackson
I've looked at this again. Sorry it's been so long. Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#1031793: dgit: Treat single-debian-patch as implying --quilt=single"): > I still regret that this change went into bookworm, and would like to > simplify things again. I still think that this is a cas

Bug#1031793: dgit: Treat single-debian-patch as implying --quilt=single

2024-03-20 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Wed 22 Feb 2023 at 05:21pm -07, Sean Whitton wrote: > > Right, but the pile of Emacs addons I maintain using dgit-maint-merge(7) > will never hit any of those behaviours. So it's a high cost to impose > on someone in a position such as mine. > I still regret that this change went

Bug#1031793: dgit: Treat single-debian-patch as implying --quilt=single

2023-02-23 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Thu 23 Feb 2023 at 12:42AM GMT, Ian Jackson wrote: > Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#1031793: dgit: Treat single-debian-patch as > implying --quilt=single"): >> I'm reluctant to introduce something else like this when we already have >> the git-debpush tags

Bug#1031793: dgit: Treat single-debian-patch as implying --quilt=single

2023-02-22 Thread Ian Jackson
Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#1031793: dgit: Treat single-debian-patch as implying --quilt=single"): > I'm reluctant to introduce something else like this when we already have > the git-debpush tags thing. Hmm -- is there some reason why dgit > couldn't put information in those t

Bug#1031793: dgit: Treat single-debian-patch as implying --quilt=single

2023-02-22 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Wed 22 Feb 2023 at 09:45PM GMT, Ian Jackson wrote: > Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#1031793: dgit: Treat single-debian-patch as > implying --quilt=single"): >> How about having single-debian-patch imply --quilt=single in the absence >> of any other sett

Bug#1031793: dgit: Treat single-debian-patch as implying --quilt=single

2023-02-22 Thread Ian Jackson
Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#1031793: dgit: Treat single-debian-patch as implying --quilt=single"): > How about having single-debian-patch imply --quilt=single in the absence > of any other setting or command line argument for the quilt mode? > Then in the docs we would say tha

Bug#1031793: dgit: Treat single-debian-patch as implying --quilt=single

2023-02-22 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Wed 22 Feb 2023 at 01:28PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote: > This is still better than the previous situation because dgit will undo > some problems created by single-debian-patch (right?). Re-reading #1018984, I see that this is not right. I still think we should have s-d-p imply

Bug#1031793: dgit: Treat single-debian-patch as implying --quilt=single

2023-02-22 Thread Sean Whitton
Package: dgit Version: 10.6 Hello, I think that it's very unfortunate that one of our flagship workflows, dgit-maint-merge(7), now requires local git configuration, in the form of 'git config --local dgit.default.quilt-mode single'. Git configuration is a pain to automate. I understand the