Hi carnil,
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 at 21:49:21 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> thanks for the analysis. I want to point out that it's really
> important to not rely on the POC for making the not-affected
> assessment (and when not confirmed, rather err on the safe side and
> keep something
Hi Guilhem,
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 at 18:08:39 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> > bullseye
> >
> >
> > $ lua5.1 ./cstack.lua
> > testing stack overflow detection
> > nesting coroutines running after recoverable errors
> >
On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 at 18:08:39 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> bullseye
>
>
> $ lua5.1 ./cstack.lua
> testing stack overflow detection
> nesting coroutines running after recoverable errors
> final count:198
>
> $ lua5.2 ./cstack.lua
> testing stack overflow detection
>
Hi Moritz,
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 20:58:00 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> CVE-2021-43519[0]:
> | Stack overflow in lua_resume of ldo.c in Lua Interpreter 5.1.0~5.4.4
> | allows attackers to perform a Denial of Service via a crafted script
> | file.
While trigaging this for LTS I was unable to
Source: lua5.3
X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org
Severity: important
Tags: security
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for lua5.3.
CVE-2021-43519[0]:
| Stack overflow in lua_resume of ldo.c in Lua Interpreter 5.1.0~5.4.4
| allows attackers to perform a Denial of Service via a
5 matches
Mail list logo
