Bug#1035436: rkdeveloptool: diff for NMU version 1.32+git20210408.46bb4c0-2.1

2023-05-20 Thread Christopher Obbard
Hi Andreas, I uploaded a new version this morning with the fix; it has a -3 suffix so it should reject your NMU which had a -2.1 suffix. As I am fairly new to Debian processes, it is great you have walked me through it. Thank you! On 20 May 2023 12:07:03 BST, Andreas Metzler wrote: >On 2023-

Bug#1035436: rkdeveloptool: diff for NMU version 1.32+git20210408.46bb4c0-2.1

2023-05-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2023-05-20 Christopher Obbard wrote: [...] > > I've prepared an NMU for rkdeveloptool (versioned as > > 1.32+git20210408.46bb4c0-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/1. [...] > Thank you for your contribution, but it seems like there is some > parallel work (this morning in fact). > I am currently

Bug#1035436: rkdeveloptool: diff for NMU version 1.32+git20210408.46bb4c0-2.1

2023-05-20 Thread Christopher Obbard
Hi, On Sat, 2023-05-20 at 11:07 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Control: tags 1035436 + patch > Control: tags 1035436 + pending > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for rkdeveloptool (versioned as > 1.32+git20210408.46bb4c0-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel > free to tell

Bug#1035436: rkdeveloptool: diff for NMU version 1.32+git20210408.46bb4c0-2.1

2023-05-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
Control: tags 1035436 + patch Control: tags 1035436 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for rkdeveloptool (versioned as 1.32+git20210408.46bb4c0-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. kind regards Andreas -- `What a good friend