tags 1035725 + upstream patch
forwarded 1035725 https://github.com/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup/issues/872
user l...@pca.it
usertags 770171 + pca.it-backup
thanks
Hi there,
On Sun, 14 Jan 2024 10:55:06 +0100, Henrik Riomar wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 5:00 AM Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > Looking
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 5:00 AM Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
>
> Looking at https://github.com/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup/issues/872
> this was fixed in latest rdiff-backup, which is now available in
> Debian unstable.
>
> If you can confirm that this version fixes the issue, I can backport
> it to Debi
On Sat, 20 May 2023 at 12:24, Henrik Riomar wrote:
>
> Reproduction of the bug is simple with safekeep from a system running Debian
> 11 trying to backup a system running Debian 12.
>
> The backup can not even start, just get "Exception ''restrict_path'' raised
> of class ''" from rdiff-backup o
Reproduction of the bug is simple with safekeep from a system running
Debian 11 trying to backup a system running Debian 12.
The backup can not even start, just get "Exception ''restrict_path'' raised
of class ''" from rdiff-backup on Debian 12.
Full back-trace from safekeep in the upstream bug r
Severity: important
Hi!
Yes, we could try push this into Bookworm, but importance needs to be
justified.
Can you explain the problem and severity of the issue, steps to reproduce
and maybe copy-paste the command and resulting error message too?
sorry upstream version with fix is 2.2.5 (not 2.5.0)
Package: rdiff-backup
Version: 2.2.2-1
The version of rdiff-backup in Bookworm is not backwards compatible with
the version
in Debian Bullseye (2.0.5-2)
Problem addressed in upstream version 2.5.0 or with this diff:
https://github.com/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup/commit/a2735047ea19ca05b219d26f4731c
7 matches
Mail list logo