On 10/05/2023 03.22, Rob Browning wrote:
Right, I'm actually working on a release for this. I think I should be
able to upload today or tomorrow, and not sure if we need to wait for
preapproval aince we'd want this in any other future migrations from
I don't think there is need for
Control: tag -1 patch
On 10/05/2023 03.22, Rob Browning wrote:
Andreas Beckmann writes:
There are some elpa packages from bullseye that won't be in bookworm and
that are incompatible with emacs 28, i.e. upgrading emacs will fail if
these packages are still installed.
Therefore emacs-common
Rob Browning writes:
> Right, I'm actually working on a release for this. I think I should be
> able to upload today or tomorrow, and not sure if we need to wait for
> preapproval aince we'd want this in any other future migrations from
> unstable to testing/bullseye.
Oh, and possibly cf.
Rob Browning writes:
> Rob Browning writes:
>
>> Right, I'm actually working on a release for this. I think I should be
>> able to upload today or tomorrow, and not sure if we need to wait for
>> preapproval aince we'd want this in any other future migrations from
>> unstable to
Andreas Beckmann writes:
> There are some elpa packages from bullseye that won't be in bookworm and
> that are incompatible with emacs 28, i.e. upgrading emacs will fail if
> these packages are still installed.
> Therefore emacs-common needs to add Breaks against them s.t. they get
> removed
Package: emacs-common
Version: 1:28.2+1-14
Severity: serious
There are some elpa packages from bullseye that won't be in bookworm and
that are incompatible with emacs 28, i.e. upgrading emacs will fail if
these packages are still installed.
Therefore emacs-common needs to add Breaks against them
6 matches
Mail list logo