Hi Andreas
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 11:24, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 01:06:41PM + schrieb Graham Inggs:
> > At least the following packages are failing their own autopkgtests in
> > unstable (list not complete):
> > r-bioc-cummerbund
> > r-bioc-decoupler
> > r-bioc-monocle
Hi Graham,
Am Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:23:00PM + schrieb Graham Inggs:
> tracker.d.o. is having some issues (see #1043546), but you can still
> access up-to-date excuses here:
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-bioc-biocgenerics
>
> The current blocker I see is:
> Implicit
Hi Andreas
Sorry for the incomplete reply. I'll respond to the other points when
I have more time.
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 11:24, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Do you see any further blockers?
tracker.d.o. is having some issues (see #1043546), but you can still
access up-to-date excuses here:
Hi,
the last new precondition was accepted so all r-bioc-* packages are
uploaded and built meanwhile. The only not-transitioned package is
r-bioc-bitseq where I filed a removal bug for[1]. So we have at least
all r-bioc-* packages in their current version.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/1049359
Hi Andreas
You should check on the package tracker pages for all the r-bioc-*
uploads and make sure they are ready to migrate along with
r-bioc-biocgenerics, e.g. r-bioc-cummerbund [1].
r-bioc-biocversion appears to break the autopkgtest of
r-cran-biocmanager/1.30.21.1+dfsg-1 in testing.
At
Hi Andreas,
On 29-07-2023 21:52, Andreas Tille wrote:
IT can't be uploaded since the new version will not build due to the
missing dependencies that need to clear new.
As I understand it, you don't need to wait with *uploading*, the
buildd's will just wait building until the build
Hi Paul,
Am Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 07:44:32PM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers:
>
> Well, I didn't check everything yet (hint is at [1])
Thanks for the hint - this was the point I wanted to make with my mail.
> but at least the
> autopkgtest regression in r-bioc-rhdf5filters (see [2] to find that in
>
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 07:44:32PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Well, I didn't check everything yet (hint is at [1]) but at least the
> autopkgtest regression in r-bioc-rhdf5filters (see [2] to find that in
> unstable it fails too) should really be solved.
I've fixed hdf5filters and uploaded to
Hi Andreas,
On 29-07-2023 12:51, Andreas Tille wrote:
all r-bioc-* packages except
r-bioc-bitseq
which is not maintained upstream and should probably be removed (as in
the last transition) and
r-bioc-scater
r-bioc-deseq
r-bioc-isoformswitchanalyzer
are uploaded. The latter
Hi,
all r-bioc-* packages except
r-bioc-bitseq
which is not maintained upstream and should probably be removed (as in
the last transition) and
r-bioc-scater
r-bioc-deseq
r-bioc-isoformswitchanalyzer
are uploaded. The latter three have new dependencies which are uploaded
to new.
10 matches
Mail list logo
