Bug#1040908: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#1040908: Bug#1040908: Please don't depend on mdadm

2023-07-12 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 12.07.23 um 18:11 schrieb Josh Triplett: My understanding was that that error happens *unconditionally* whether there's a RAID device on the system or not, and that that bug is fixed by depending on libblockdev-mdraid3 (which seems fine). But if I'm understanding the upstream issue correctly,

Bug#1040908: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#1040908: Please don't depend on mdadm

2023-07-12 Thread Josh Triplett
On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 13:14:47 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 12.07.23 um 11:14 schrieb Josh Triplett: > > Package: libblockdev-mdraid3 > > Version: 3.0.1-1 > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org > > > > Current udisks2 has a dependency on libblockdev-mdraid3, and > >

Bug#1040908: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#1040908: Please don't depend on mdadm

2023-07-12 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 12.07.23 um 11:14 schrieb Josh Triplett: Package: libblockdev-mdraid3 Version: 3.0.1-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org Current udisks2 has a dependency on libblockdev-mdraid3, and libblockdev-mdraid3 has a dependency on mdadm. This effectively makes mdadm required on

Bug#1040908: Please don't depend on mdadm

2023-07-12 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: libblockdev-mdraid3 Version: 3.0.1-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org Current udisks2 has a dependency on libblockdev-mdraid3, and libblockdev-mdraid3 has a dependency on mdadm. This effectively makes mdadm required on desktop systems. As I understand it from