Hello,
On Mon 14 Aug 2023 at 10:47am +01, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#1042889: vm: autopkgtest fails against Emacs 29.1"):
>> vm's autopkgtest fails with Emacs 29.1, which latter is now in sid.
>>
>> https://ci.debian.net/packages/v/vm/te
Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#1042889: vm: autopkgtest fails against Emacs 29.1"):
> vm's autopkgtest fails with Emacs 29.1, which latter is now in sid.
>
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/v/vm/testing/amd64/
The regression was indeed caused solely by upstream renaming the
variable
Hello,
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 02:49pm +01, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#1042889: vm: autopkgtest fails against Emacs 29.1"):
>> vm's autopkgtest fails with Emacs 29.1, which latter is now in sid.
>
> Hi, Sean, as you see we're looking into this.
> I
Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#1042889: vm: autopkgtest fails against Emacs 29.1"):
> vm's autopkgtest fails with Emacs 29.1, which latter is now in sid.
Hi, Sean, as you see we're looking into this.
I have some questions for you as an Emacs expert:
Is byte-compilation known to be som
Source: vm
Version: 8.2.0b-10
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer,
vm's autopkgtest fails with Emacs 29.1, which latter is now in sid.
https://ci.debian.net/packages/v/vm/testing/amd64/
Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
5 matches
Mail list logo