Bug#1043419: runit: ineffective trigger interest due to /usr-merge

2023-09-25 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Lorenzo, On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 11:35:58PM +0200, Lorenzo wrote: > Just to avoid any misunderstanding: this discussion has nothing to do > with this bug (duplicate triggers) except that is about usrmerge and > runit; I'm discussing here only because you said you need a public > record. Yeah.

Bug#1043419: runit: ineffective trigger interest due to /usr-merge

2023-09-24 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Lorenzo, On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 07:59:52PM +0200, Lorenzo wrote: > I'm resending this to the bug as requested to have a public record; also > I'm Cc Ian Jackson as he might already be working on this. Thank you. Giving a more detailed reply now. > Well yes, my problem is that I know for sure

Bug#1043419: runit: ineffective trigger interest due to /usr-merge

2023-09-24 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Lorenzo, On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 08:14:46PM +0200, Lorenzo wrote: > > If doing this, your base-files-unmerged would have to declare > > Replaces, Conflicts and Provides with base-files and fully replace its > > functionality. Otherwise, it would cause a file conflict on /bin, > > which will bec

Bug#1043419: runit: ineffective trigger interest due to /usr-merge

2023-08-10 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: runit Version: 2.1.2-54 Severity: important Hi Lorenzo, The runit package declares quite broad trigger interest: | interest-noawait /usr/sbin | interest-noawait /usr/bin | interest-noawait /etc/init.d | interest-noawait /lib/systemd/system Would you be able to shed some light on why it