Bug#1050053: xml2rfc: recommends empty package fonts-noto-unhinted

2023-09-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Scott Kitterman (2023-09-15 07:49:52) > > > On September 15, 2023 5:37:23 AM UTC, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >Scott Kitterman wrote: > >>> Please change the dependency to the appropriate package instead. > >>> Thank you. > >> Which one is that? I can't find any indication in the package

Bug#1050053: xml2rfc: recommends empty package fonts-noto-unhinted

2023-09-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
On September 15, 2023 5:37:23 AM UTC, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >Scott Kitterman wrote: >>> Please change the dependency to the appropriate package instead. >>> Thank you. >> Which one is that? I can't find any indication in the package what >> replaced it. > >The binary package

Bug#1050053: xml2rfc: recommends empty package fonts-noto-unhinted

2023-09-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Scott Kitterman wrote: >> Please change the dependency to the appropriate package instead. >> Thank you. > Which one is that? I can't find any indication in the package what > replaced it. The binary package fonts-noto-unhinted is currently empty because it contained only fonts lacking hinting,

Bug#1050053: xml2rfc: recommends empty package fonts-noto-unhinted

2023-08-18 Thread Daijohn . Bester
Source: xml2rfc Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, The package xml2rfc recommends an empty package fonts-noto-unhinted. Please change the dependency to the appropriate package instead. Thank you.