Hi,
On 06-06-2024 8:54 a.m., Helmut Grohne wrote:
I think this is fine. Doing final checks then uploading it all.
For the record, the set of base-files, bash, dash, glibc and util-linux
migrated yesterday in the 16:00 UTC britney2 run after some hinting from
the Release Team side (me).
Pau
Hi Aurelien,
Trimmed Cc list for glibc matters.
On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 11:16:50PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Oops, I was convinced that #1071462 was filled with severity serious.
> Nevermind.
It migrated anyway. :)
> Ok, a simultaneous experimental NMU sounds good.
Ok, will do with a bit
Hi Helmut
On 2024-06-05 14:21, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 06:58:00PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > It would be really great if glibc can migrate before as it fixes an RC
> > bug. That said there are suspicions that it introduced bug #1072521, so
> > it migh
Hi Aurelien,
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 06:58:00PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> It would be really great if glibc can migrate before as it fixes an RC
> bug. That said there are suspicions that it introduced bug #1072521, so
> it might be worth investigating before it gets pushed into testing.
> Un
Hi,
On 2024-06-03 23:10, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 03:14:59PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Since noble includes these changes and I'd get this done sooner rather
> > than later, how about moving forward with June 5th after 22:30 UTC (such
> > that all buildds have regenerat
El 3/6/24 a las 23:10, Helmut Grohne escribió:
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 03:14:59PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Since noble includes these changes and I'd get this done sooner rather
than later, how about moving forward with June 5th after 22:30 UTC (such
that all buildds have regenerated their
* Helmut Grohne [240603 23:11]:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 03:14:59PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Since noble includes these changes and I'd get this done sooner rather
> > than later, how about moving forward with June 5th after 22:30 UTC (such
> > that all buildds have regenerated their chroo
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 03:14:59PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Since noble includes these changes and I'd get this done sooner rather
> than later, how about moving forward with June 5th after 22:30 UTC (such
> that all buildds have regenerated their chroots before the upload)?
I got vaguely pos
Hi release team,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:55:09AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I propose April 11th on the condition that all relevant packages
> (including cryptsetup and e2fsprogs) have migrated. I'll also check with
> Aurelien on feasibility after Easter.
Stuff wasn't ready back then and we
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 09:50:11PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > I'd now like to coordinate a time of upload. Given that chroots are
> > rebuilt in Wednesday and Sunday, I suggest we pick a Thursday morning
> > for the actual upload. If I unexpectedly break stuff, I still have a few
> >
On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 09:39:50PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi release team and essential maintainers,
>
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 10:33:54PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Once these issues have been resolved, we can move most files except for
> > a small set of essential packages. For thos
Hi
On 2024-03-09 21:39:50 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi release team and essential maintainers,
>
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 10:33:54PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Once these issues have been resolved, we can move most files except for
> > a small set of essential packages. For those, a coo
Hi release team and essential maintainers,
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 10:33:54PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Once these issues have been resolved, we can move most files except for
> a small set of essential packages. For those, a coordinated upload
> moving their files will be needed as will be an
Hi Sebastian,
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 09:24:45AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> thanks for the detailed explanation.
thanks for following up in detail.
> On 2023-09-04 22:33:54 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Skipping all the technical details, as I would not classify this as a
> transition wh
Hi Helmut
thanks for the detailed explanation.
On 2023-09-04 22:33:54 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Unless there is disagreement, I intend to move forward with moving
> systemd units on the grounds that the moratorium only is a
> recommendation and this transition request.
Skipping all the techn
Hi Helmut,
On 04/09/2023 22.33, Helmut Grohne wrote:
If you
disagree with this and do not want to get involved, please just close
this transition request.
Given the impact (size) of this transition, I'd like to also see Graham,
Cyril (for d-i) and Sebastian acknowledge this request.
I agree
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear release team,
you may be aware from d-devel@l.d.o discussions that things got rolling
regarding a way forward from our current /usr-merge state. The results
of various discussions have been recorded
17 matches
Mail list logo
