> > The ci.debian.net results for mariadb seem to be very flaky lately (on
> > amd64 they fail roughly 9/10) since version 1:10.11.6-1. Might be
> > related (although the failure is different). i386 and arm64 seem to be
> > exceptions.
>
> No - the current CI failures for MariaDB are unrelated and
Hi!
> The ci.debian.net results for mariadb seem to be very flaky lately (on
> amd64 they fail roughly 9/10) since version 1:10.11.6-1. Might be
> related (although the failure is different). i386 and arm64 seem to be
> exceptions.
No - the current CI failures for MariaDB are unrelated and not
Hi,
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 10:59:50 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
On 02/10/23 at 21:59 -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The relevant lines from log seems to be:
>
> > main.bind_address_resolution w4 [ fail ]
> ...
> > 2023-09-26 6:31:03 0 [ERROR] Can't start server: Bind
Hi,
On 02/10/23 at 21:59 -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The relevant lines from log seems to be:
>
> > main.bind_address_resolution w4 [ fail ]
> ...
> > 2023-09-26 6:31:03 0 [ERROR] Can't start server: Bind on TCP/IP port. Got
> > error: 98: Address already in use
> >
Hi!
The relevant lines from log seems to be:
> main.bind_address_resolution w4 [ fail ]
...
> 2023-09-26 6:31:03 0 [ERROR] Can't start server: Bind on TCP/IP port. Got
> error: 98: Address already in use
> 2023-09-26 6:31:03 0 [ERROR] Do you already have another server running on
5 matches
Mail list logo
