Bug#1053405: darktable: FTBFS on arm64 (gcc bug?)

2024-02-21 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 11:47:25 +0100 Tino Mettler wrote: Version: 4.4.2-1.1 Hi, OPENMP support was disabled for arm64 in the 4.4.2-1.1 package, so this bug can be closed. I also stumbled again over this FTBFS bug after accidently enabling OPENMP yesterday for the darktable 4.6.1-1 package, so

Bug#1053405: darktable: FTBFS on arm64 (gcc bug?)

2023-11-27 Thread Boyuan Yang
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 08:56:00 +0200 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: reassign -1 src:gcc-13 > control: found -1 13.2.0-4 > control: affects -1 src:darktable. > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677 > According to upstream, we need a patch that was added some days ago on 13

Bug#1053405: darktable: FTBFS on arm64 (gcc bug?)

2023-10-05 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: reassign -1 src:gcc-13 control: found -1 13.2.0-4 control: affects -1 src:darktable. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677 According to upstream, we need a patch that was added some days ago on 13 branch G. On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 08:21:31 +0200 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:

Bug#1053405: darktable: FTBFS on arm64 (gcc bug?)

2023-10-04 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, Do you think maybe there should be a debian gcc bug? after all, the distinction you point to is a difference of debian version. Not really sure, somewhat it fails with gcc-12 too, so it might be something that was even backported to older gcc, or something else For sure, it builds

Bug#1053405: darktable: FTBFS on arm64 (gcc bug?)

2023-10-03 Thread David Bremner
Gianfranco Costamagna writes: > Source: darktable > Version: 4.4.2-1 > Severity: serious > forwarded: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677 > tags: ftbfs > Do you think maybe there should be a debian gcc bug? after all, the distinction you point to is a difference of debian