On 10/21/23 01:58, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2023-10-20 13:49:01 [+0800], WANG Xuerui wrote:
This is likely upstream issue
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/21340, manifesting on Debian due
to the packaged binutils not having Loongson SIMD support yet, and fixed by
upstream
On 2023-10-20 13:49:01 [+0800], WANG Xuerui wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> This is likely upstream issue
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/21340, manifesting on Debian due
> to the packaged binutils not having Loongson SIMD support yet, and fixed by
> upstream commit
Hi,
This is likely upstream issue
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/21340, manifesting on Debian
due to the packaged binutils not having Loongson SIMD support yet, and
fixed by upstream commit 160f48941d143cf2682df4e938ba953c96ac3c7a.
I'd suggest including the upstream patch so we
Package: openssl
Version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: ftbfs
User:debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: loongarch64
OpenSSL 3.1.x in experimental FTBFS on loong64:
|crypto/aes/vpaes-loongarch64.S: Assembler messages:
|crypto/aes/vpaes-loongarch64.S:24: Error: no match insn: vori.b
4 matches
Mail list logo