Bug#1061961:

2024-02-28 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 2/29/24 5:17 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 17:11, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 2/28/24 8:33 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: Hi, thanks for taking the NMU. Unfortunately it looks like you uploaded just slightly too early and the package was built with 32 bit

Bug#1061961:

2024-02-28 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 17:11, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 2/28/24 8:33 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > Hi, thanks for taking the NMU. Unfortunately it looks like you uploaded > > just slightly too early and the package was built with 32 bit time_t on > ARM > > That's odd, because

Bug#1061961:

2024-02-28 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 2/28/24 8:33 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: Hi, thanks for taking the NMU. Unfortunately it looks like you uploaded just slightly too early and the package was built with 32 bit time_t on ARM That's odd, because gcc-13 and dpkg were already built & installed on armel & armhf. I also

Bug#1061961:

2024-02-28 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi, thanks for taking the NMU. Unfortunately it looks like you uploaded just slightly too early and the package was built with 32 bit time_t on ARM :(

Bug#1061961: fyba: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-30 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 1/30/24 16:32, Lukas Märdian wrote: Am 30.01.24 um 16:06 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg: On 1/30/24 15:57, Lukas Märdian wrote: But please remember that this is meant to only hit experimental for now, until the dpkg change lands in unstable. So please don't upload it into unstable just yet.

Bug#1061961: fyba: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-30 Thread Lukas Märdian
Am 30.01.24 um 16:06 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg: On 1/30/24 15:57, Lukas Märdian wrote: But please remember that this is meant to only hit experimental for now, until the dpkg change lands in unstable. So please don't upload it into unstable just yet. gdal will need to be rebuilt once

Bug#1061961: fyba: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-30 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 1/30/24 15:57, Lukas Märdian wrote: But please remember that this is meant to only hit experimental for now, until the dpkg change lands in unstable. So please don't upload it into unstable just yet. gdal will need to be rebuilt once fyba moves to unstable, how will these transitions be

Bug#1061961: fyba: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-30 Thread Lukas Märdian
Am 30.01.24 um 15:22 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg: On 1/30/24 14:50, Lukas Märdian wrote: If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP.  Although this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a period of several days before we begin uploads to

Bug#1061961: fyba: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-30 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 1/30/24 14:50, Lukas Märdian wrote: If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP. Although this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a period of several days before we begin uploads to unstable; so if information becomes available that your

Bug#1061961: fyba: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-01-30 Thread Lukas Märdian
Source: fyba Version: 4.1.1-8 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond