Bug#1062742: libzia: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-24 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Daniele Forsi > please don't put version numbers in the package descriptions: For libzia, it's also questionable to put the version number into the package - that "lib" is only used by a single rdep, tucnak. We should rather move libzia into tucnak; the split has causes several problems in the

Bug#1062742: libzia: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-24 Thread Daniele Forsi
Hello Steve, please don't put version numbers in the package descriptions: > Description: sharable and platform-dependent library for Tucnak >- libzia contains the platform abstraction layer for the tucnak package. >+ libzia-4.36 contains the platform abstraction layer for the tucnak package. >

Bug#1062742: libzia: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-24 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello, An oversight with regards to the provides: handling support in debhelper means the package in experimental does not correctly declare compatibility on 64-bit archs with the prior ABI. Please find an updated patch attached. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough a

Bug#1062742: libzia: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-02 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: libzia Version: 4.52-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending sid trixie Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded to unstable yet! Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition requi