Bug#1065199: RM: pprintpp -- ROM; leaf package

2024-03-28 Thread Alexandre Detiste
I dug more: The original ITP states it was a hard dependency of "rich". Now 'rich' does all that and more all by itself. (and more importantly is maintained)

Bug#1065199: RM: pprintpp -- ROM; leaf package

2024-03-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi ftpmasters, Am Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 11:55:24AM +0100 schrieb Alexandre Detiste: > > > > ? #1065199 RM: pprintpp -- ROM; leaf package > > Do we need this package? > It looks dead upstream & was a trivial utility, let's drop it. For the package pprintpp there is consens that this can be

Bug#1065199: RM: pprintpp -- ROM; leaf package

2024-03-01 Thread Sandro Tosi
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove X-Debbugs-Cc: pprin...@packages.debian.org, mo...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:pprintpp please remove pprintpp, dak shows no rdeps