Bug#1065978: Handle listxattr failures better (upstream patch 9.1.0162)

2024-03-10 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
Thanks, James! I'm deeply grateful for your work on vim, thank you so much for maintaining it! paultag On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 8:17 PM James McCoy wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 05:44:27PM -0400, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote: > > I sent a fix to upstream vim to handle a bug where vim would

Bug#1065978: Handle listxattr failures better (upstream patch 9.1.0162)

2024-03-10 Thread James McCoy
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 05:44:27PM -0400, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote: > I sent a fix to upstream vim to handle a bug where vim would attempt > to allocate size_t max (for me, 0x aka > 18446744073709551615 bytes) when the filesystem responded with an > error on listxattr other than no

Bug#1065978: Handle listxattr failures better (upstream patch 9.1.0162)

2024-03-10 Thread Paul R. Tagliamonte
Package: vim Severity: wishlist Tags: patch I sent a fix to upstream vim to handle a bug where vim would attempt to allocate size_t max (for me, 0x aka 18446744073709551615 bytes) when the filesystem responded with an error on listxattr other than not supported. The upstream patch