Hi
On 20-05-2024 11:26 a.m., Drew Parsons wrote:
Something weird happened with the slepc upload (3.20.2+dfsg1-1).
See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071469
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2024-05-15 09:20, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
I think the best way to deal with it is to pretend it never happened
and move on with petsc 3.20, upgrading from petsc 3.19. We'd want to
doing this upgrade anyway.
Please go ahead.
All uploads have been made now (including dolfin). Just
On 2024-05-15 10:00, Drew Parsons wrote:
On 2024-05-15 09:20, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
While looking at the tracker, I noticed that petsc is still building
manual -dbg packages. IS there a reason that those have not been
converted to automatic -dbgsym packages?
No, it's not about symbols.
On 2024-05-15 09:20, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Control: tags -1 confirmed
The petsc patch for the 64-bit time_t transition was deeply invasive.
It makes petsc (and slepc) essentially unmaintainable.
I think the best way to deal with it is to pretend it never happened
and move on with petsc
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi
On 2024-03-17 22:52:51 +0100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: pe...@packages.debian.org, francesco.balla...@unicatt.it
> Control: affects -1 + src:petsc
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: pe...@packages.debian.org, francesco.balla...@unicatt.it
Control: affects -1 + src:petsc
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
The petsc patch for the 64-bit time_t transition was deeply invasive.
It makes
6 matches
Mail list logo
