Hi David,
On 4/30/24 18:21, David Lamparter wrote:
flipped libatomic to be linked unconditionally.
it's not harmful to do so on architectures that don't need it, but imho
its cleaner to only be linked on affected architectures (armel m68k
powerpc sh4).
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 06:05:08PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> my initial attempt in 10.0-0.2 to link with libatomic didn't work, I've
> fixed that locally but a build to confirming on an armel porterbox is
> runnning before uploading 10.0-0.3 in some minutes..
I've synced in (all of) your
tag 1067077 +pending
thanks
Hi,
my initial attempt in 10.0-0.2 to link with libatomic didn't work, I've
fixed that locally but a build to confirming on an armel porterbox is
runnning before uploading 10.0-0.3 in some minutes..
Regards,
Daniel
Source: frr
Version: 9.1-0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=frr=armel=9.1-0.1=1710631814=0
libtool: link: gcc -fms-extensions
4 matches
Mail list logo