Jay Berkenbilt dixit:
>How's that?
That explains it very well and not ambiguous to nōn-native
speakers (I hope).
Thanks,
//mirabilos
--
15:41⎜ Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)
(Sorry for the duplicate -- I inadvertently failed to cc the bug report on my
private reply.)
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024, at 1:50 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Jay Berkenbilt dixit:
>
> >As it happens, I am upstream.
>
> Oh, nice ☻ in that case, thanks for qpdf.
>
> >---
> >It is not generally
Jay Berkenbilt dixit:
>As it happens, I am upstream.
Oh, nice ☻ in that case, thanks for qpdf.
>---
>It is not generally practical to remove objects from QDF files without
>messing up object numbering, but if you remove all indirect references
>to an object (without removing the object itself),
Sorry for the top-post. As it happens, I am upstream. I have rewritten the
pargraph
as follows. I think this is clearer. What do you think? If you like it, I'll
close this. My fix
is here: https://github.com/qpdf/qpdf/pull/1187
---
It is not generally practical to remove objects from QDF files
Jay Berkenbilt dixit:
>Can you tell me where in the docs it says what you're describing?
>Here's a direct quote from the current qpdf documentation:
>
>It is not generally practical to remove objects from QDF files without
>messing up object numbering, but if you remove all references to an
Can you tell me where in the docs it says what you're describing?
Here's a direct quote from the current qpdf documentation:
It is not generally practical to remove objects from QDF files without
messing up object numbering, but if you remove all references to an
object, you can run qpdf on the
Package: qpdf
Version: 10.1.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de, n...@naturalnet.de
The qpdf documentation states that it is possible to remove an object
then run fix-qdf and it should renumber the remaining objects.
In an exemplary PDF, I did this:
- qpdf --qdf
7 matches
Mail list logo
