Bug#1067708: new upstream versions as NMU vs. xz maintenance

2024-03-27 Thread krygorin4545
>> Very much *not* a fan of NMUs doing large changes such as >> new upstream versions. Instead of having a policy debate over who is proper to do this upload, can this just be fixed? The named maintainer hasn't done an upload in 5 years. Fedora considered this a serious bug and fixed it weeks

Bug#1067708: new upstream versions as NMU vs. xz maintenance

2024-03-27 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 26 March 2024 23:11:19 CET, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >Very much *not* a fan of NMUs doing large changes such as >new upstream versions. Most of the changes are part of current -2. Ppl complainted about valgrind reports which are addressed in the new upstream version. >But this does give us

Bug#1067708: new upstream versions as NMU vs. xz maintenance

2024-03-26 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Very much *not* a fan of NMUs doing large changes such as new upstream versions. But this does give us the question, what’s up with the maintenance of xz-utils? Same as with the lack of security uploads of git, which you also maintain, are you active? Are you well? bye, //mirabilos -- (gnutls